Philip J. Trounstine III———— July 30,1949–April 11, 2022

My brother, Phil Trounstine, whom I adored.
Obit. for Sac. Bee in California, written by the family of Phil Trounstine

APTOS, CA: Phil Trounstine, an esteemed, insightful, and passionate California political journalist who found his greatest joy as the beloved patriarch of his family, passed away peacefully in his sleep on April 11, 2022. He was 72.

As a reporter, Phil was so determined and fearless he earned the nickname “Mad Dog.” As a colleague and friend, he was frank and funny, with a vast store of kindness and generosity which he sometimes hid beneath a gruff exterior. As a husband, father, grandfather, brotherand son he was devoted and doting, delighting in raucous conversations at dinner and elaborate family vacations. His life and work touched scores of people and he leaves behind a vast network of those whose lives were immeasurably improved for having known him.

Philip J. Trounstine III was born in Cincinnati, Ohio to Henry Philip Trounstine and Amy Joseph (May) Trounstine on July 30th, 1949. Phil grew up alongside his sisters, Jean Trounstine and Peggy (Trounstine) Breitbart, in a historic Jewish enclave of the city and attended North Avondale Elementary School and Walnut Hills High School. During childhood summers spent at Lake Charlevoix, Michigan, and Camp Kooch-i-ching, in Minnesota, Phil learned a deep love of nature and honed his competence as an outdoorsman. His time as a camper and as a counselor were pivotal to the development of Phil’s skills as a leader and community builder, and led to many life-long relationships. Phil was a mischievous, gregarious and loyal friend who from a young age, loved language and displayed enormous talent as a writer.

After high school, Phil attended the University of Vermont and Stanford University before earning a BA at San Jose State University. Amid the tumult of the 1960s and 70s, he worked tirelessly to help end the war in Vietnam, joining the radical anti-war group, Venceremos, and the Midpeninsula Free University.

Phil received his degree in Journalism after serving as Editor in Chief for the Spartan Daily, the student newspaper at San Jose State. His ability and gifts as a journalist landed him the Eugene S. Pulliam Fellowship at the Indianapolis Star where he began his career as an investigative reporter.

In 1978, Phil returned to California, accepting a position on the local desk at the San Jose Mercury News, a post that provided him inspiration and material for his co-authored book, Movers and Shakers: The Study of Community Power. He spent the next 20 years reporting for the Mercury News, moving up the ranks to become the paper’s Political Editor, covering countless campaigns, from contests for City Hall offices to Governor, U.S. Senate, and numerous presidential races.

Phil saw the work of journalism, and speaking truth to power, as crucial components to the maintenance of democracy. He loved to debate and challenge, and he had a wide and deep understanding of the political landscape. He also had a wicked sense of humor, which he wielded to prick the arrogance, the pretension, and vanity of pompous politicians.

As he wrote biting political satire set to the music of show tunes for San Jose’s annual Gridiron show, Phil was gaining a reputation, among the California press, from corps and beyond, as a smart, savvy and perceptive political analyst who, among other accomplishments, chronicled
the growing influence, importance and reach of Silicon Valley.

In 1998, Phil put down his reporter’s notebook to join the administration of Gray Davis, serving as Communications Director for the newly-elected California Governor. He resigned his post in 2003, to launch the Survey and Policy Research Institute at San Jose State University– and to dedicate more time to his favorite sport – golf. Phil could not stay away from reporting for long, however, and in 2009 co-founded CalBuzz, a popular website that provided news, commentary and analysis of California politics.

Family was of tremendous importance to Phil. His children, Jessica and David Trounstine, were born during the early years of his career. His first marriage was to Mary Catherine Luce and ended in 1989. Phil met the love of his life, Deborah (Debbie) Elaine Williams, two years later at a momentous party. When they married on May 1, 1993, Phil and Debbie blended their families and Phil gained three more children, Amy (Wilkes) Vegter, Ryan Wilkes, and Patrick Wilkes. Phil and Debbie traveled widely around the world, pursuing their mutual love of culture, cuisine, and entertainment.

Phil’s eight grandchildren Leah, Eliza, Elliott, Braeden, Sophia, Hugo, Henry, and Clara, were his utmost pride and joy.

The loss of Phil Trounstine is profound. 

 

INNOVATIVE REENTRY: THE FOCUS OF THOMAS KOONCE’S PAROLE HEARING 



Please see and share this article on a plan for re-entry from Thomas Koonce’s parole hearing on DIGBoston here.. It begins:

“An innovative plan to exit prison was the highpoint of Thomas Koonce’s two-and-a-half hour parole hearing before the Massachusetts Parole Board on March 24. Several formerly incarcerated men who were locked up with Koonce have proposed plans to offer housing, work, and support, providing Koonce is approved for parole.”  MORE

 

 

First Lifer Commutation in Mass. Since 1997 Goes to Gov. Council


Please see my newest article about the commutation hearing of Tom Koonce (pictured above on left). The support, including his son (Thomas Andrews on right) was enormous. A 9 1/2 hour hearing before the Gov. Council and all that came with it is detailed in my newest article for DigBoston. If Council approves the commutation, then Koonce will apply for parole. Read and share!

Parole Board Decision is Reversed

On December 23, 2021, Judge Peter Krupp did what many think is unthinkable. He reversed a blatantly unfair decision rendered by the Massachusetts Parole Board to lifer, Rolando Jimenez..

Krupp, a superior court judge, ruled on Jimenez’s case and decided that he deserved another chance at parole since the board had really paid no attention to the particulars of his case. And in fact, had no reason to deny him parole.

It took the board 11 months to issue a decision on Jimenez’s case (which is not unusual since the board has had an 8-10 months lapse between hearing and decision during Chair Gloriann Moroney’s tenure as a matter of course). They gave the applicant a three-year setback after he had tried for parole four previous times and been refused (1999, 2004, 2009 and 2014.)

Some of what Krupp criticized was the board’s specious use of language to deny Jimenez parole. The board said he showed lack of “candor” in admitting his guilt. This was blatantly an absurd comment considering the board ignored the fact that the man changed over time and (of course!) sees his actions differently as a young man than he does now as a 60-year-old.

How many of us would see the worst action of our youth the same way that we see it as we mature and understand more about human behavior?

The board’s lack of knowledge about how to treat someone who is hearing impaired (and speaks Spanish and needs an interpreter!) was also taken to task by Judge Krupp. This could have happened with many parole applicants because some board members lack the sensitivity and understanding of how to deal with people who have disabilities. The fact that an interpreter cannot guarantee an exact translation should be obvious, especially when someone’s life is at risk. Judge Krupp said, in his decision, “Given the use of TTY and an interpreter, there is a considerable question about whether Mr. Jimenez used the passive voice in describing the shots fired, or whether it came out that way through translation.”

In addition, Krupp pointed out what has been said all along about parole board lack of transparency. under Moroney. The board’s decisions are “boilerplate.” Those people attending parole hearings, i.e. Parole Watch in Massachusetts, have said this. And Judge Krupp said this. Krupp quoted sections of the decision that are essentially cut and pasted from decision to decision.

          The Board has taken into consideration Mr. Jimenez’s institutional behavior,
          as well
as his participation in available work, educational, and treatment 
          during
the period of his incarceration. The Board has also considered a risk &
          needs
assessment and whether risk reduction programs could effectively
          minimize
Mr. Jimenez’s risk of recidivism. After applying this appropriately
          high standard to
the circumstances of Mr. Jimenez’s case, the Board is
          of the unanimous opinion
that Rolando Jimenez is not yet rehabilitated and,
          therefore, does not merit parole
at this time.

Finally, Krupp pointed out the Massachusetts Parole Board essentially gives no real reason for denying Jimenez parole. That is perhaps as offensive of any of their lapses. As Gordon Haas, lifer at Norfolk MCI has pointed out in many of his reports, and, in partricular, in his 2020 report about the board’s decisions for lifers, “The Parole Board continues to eschew giving specific reasons for approving or denying paroles as well as indicating any deficient areas a lifer needs to address and relevant programs.”

For all those reasons, Jimenez had his decision overturned. He will have to go for a new parole hearing in a few months. Let’s hope the board takes this decision to heart and realizes that people in Massachusetts are watching. 

 

(pictured above the way the board now has hearings–they’ve constructed a divider in between so-called supporters and so-called victims, to emphasize the separation.)

MASS SPECIAL COMMISSION ON STRUCTURAL RACISM IN PAROLE ISSUES REPORT

“People of color are more likely to serve longer sentences, even after accounting for criminal history, demographics, initial charge severity, court jurisdiction, and neighborhood characteristics.”

Please see and share my newest at DigBoston. There are 16 recommendations and will the Parole Board pay attention to them? More