Responding to Jeff Jacoby

Even in 2012–Charles Ogletree and Austin Sarat wrote a book about “the new death penalty”

Today the Boston Globe published only two LTEs in response to Jeff Jacoby’s infuriating op-ed calling to keep life without parole, and one was 2 lines, the other in agreement with Jacoby. I am sure the Globe received many responses they chose not to publish.

Here’s mine:

Jeff Jacoby’s 8/6/23 op-ed “As capital punishment fades, progressives take aim at a new target,” is an  attempt to scare readers into believing if Massachusetts ends the harsh sentence of life without parole (LWOP), we will be overrun with “merciless terrorist[s] or serial killer[s].”

As someone who studies and writes about LWOP, the truth is 1) Per a Stanford Law study, “the incidence of commission of serious crimes by recently released lifers has been minuscule” 2) “By a 2 to 1 margin, crime survivors prefer that the criminal legal system focus on rehabilitation rather than harsh sentencing;” 3) parole is not a “get out of jail free card.” In Mass, only 50% of those with parole eligible life sentences get positive parole votes. If released, all are on lifetime parole and strictly supervised by officers.

Jacoby ignores the racist implications of this sentence– “One in 5 Black men in prison is serving a life sentence,” while “Latinx individuals comprise 16% of those serving life sentences.”  He also offensively implies that those who condemn prisons are to blame, as if ending LWOP will incite a “war to abolish punishment.”

Sadly, it is this kind of op-ed that fuels fear and propaganda.
_____________________________________________________________________-

Here is one from Nat Harrison

To the editor:

It should come as no surprise that, as Globe columnist Jeff Jacoby notes, there is now a burgeoning movement to eliminate criminal prison sentences that offer no possibility of parole. (“As capital punishment fades, progressives take aim at a new target,” Opinion, Aug 6, 2023).
The moral imperative to abolish life without parole (LWOP) is no different from that which has inspired the campaign to end capital punishment. LWOP and the death penalty both amount to the needless, cruel, state-sanctioned destruction of a life.

It’s now time for Massachusetts lawmakers to recognize this growing public revulsion, in the Commonwealth and elsewhere, and to approve legislation guaranteeing the possibility of parole review for all.

Nathaniel Harrison

 

DANCING ON BANANA PEELS: LIFE ON LIFETIME PAROLE IN MASSACHUSETTS

Please read and share my newest article at DIGBoston  It’s about the issues for so many lifers of parole that they must remain on despite success in the community.

It begins:
Khalid Mustafa attempted what many considered unthinkable: he tried to sue the Massachusetts Parole Board.

Specifically, Mustafa took legal action against the body for decisions under former Chair Gloriann Moroney. It was Moroney’s 2021 three-line decision that denied Mustafa’s petition to terminate his parole…”  

The Case for College Education Behind Bars

Please read and share my latest article which examines why Massachusetts should expand college education behind bars. This is a subject near and dear to my heart since I taught in prison for 10 years before Pell Grants were abolished. Here 

It begins “Knowledge of the power structure that runs society has made the biggest difference in my life.”

John Yang was released from MCI Concord in 2020, and is now completing his BA at Emerson College in Boston. In a far-ranging interview, he spoke about being one of four students featured at a March 24 Education in Prison conference at Emerson which aimed to show how and why college programs behind bars need expansion.

“By picking up a book, I was creating a different way of being, finding new strengths and abilities that I didn’t know I had.”  MORE

REPORT: Creating Meaningful Public Safety- A Briefing on the MA DOC

An important 168 page report was issued January 5 to the new governor Maura Healy) and her lieutenant governor, Kim Driscoll via PLS in MA from a number of incarcerated groups in the Commonwealth. It is a must-read, in my opinion. You can find it here.

According to an email from PLS Attorney Jesse White:”This briefing was led and written by the Lifers Group, Inc., the Norfolk Inmate Council, the African American Coalition Committee at MCI-Norfolk, and incarcerated community members from Old Colony Correctional Center, MCI-Concord, and Souza-Baranowski Correctional Center. It outlines issues within the Department of Correction, and proposes solutions to rectify them.” 

Key takeaways from the report:

1. Infuse Outside Leadership into the DOC
2. Return DOC to Health & Human Services
3. Require DOC and Parole Board Work Together
4. Utilize Lower Security Facilities
5. Separate Mental Health from DOC
6. Increase Skilled Training and Jobs
7. Expand Education
8. Eliminate Privatization
9. Use Medical Parole
10. Restore Furloughs

The report also expands on the need to

11. End Life Without Parole
12. Create Presumptive Parole
13. Have Civilian Oversight of the DOC
14. Have Adequate Wages 

As well as these areas of concern
1. The DOC’s Deliberate Acts of Falsely Identifying Individuals Race & Ethnicity/Truth in Numbers
2. Strengthening Rehabilitation Through Strengthening Family & Community Bonds
3. Strengthening Education and Civic Duties
4. A Separate Authority with Power to Oversee the DOC & Parole Board
5. Help Implement Legislation to Provide Legitimate Oversight Authority of the DOC